Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Indeed, and I've no wish to impede anyone in efforts to fix bugs. > > I'm arguing for interpretation of the social contract such that > > DFSG violations are bugs by definition, so they can be fixed as > > such. > > The DFSG doesn't define bugs. It defines release-critical bugs. Bugs > that are not release-critical are still occasionally fixed. :)
Yes, I agree. I don't know what else you expect; have I given reason to make you think I'd disagree with that statement? -- \ “A child of five could understand this. Fetch me a child of | `\ five.” —Groucho Marx | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
