On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:17:11 +0000, Anthony Towns <a...@erisian.com.au> said:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 07:51:16PM +0000, Philip Hands wrote: >> Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> writes: > - only resignations from >> people who would have been expired count in S FWIW I think either of >> those deals with the concerns I raised, as it's going to be way too >> much effort to game that, and I cannot see why anyone would want to >> bother to do so. > I think: > On Jan 1st of each year the term of any Committee member who has > served more than 42 months (3.5 years) and who is one of the two most > senior members is set to expire on Dec 31st of that year. > would work as a description of that approach. Seems like a pretty good > compromise between '2' and '2-R'. > Also, it makes the arbitrarily chosen constant 42, which is always a > good thing. Yes, due to the use of the constant 42, this wording is clearly preferable to the wording I proposed in another email. (I think it's a clearer wording too.) -- Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87lhn5imlr....@desiato.home.uhoreg.ca
