Anthony Towns <a...@erisian.com.au> writes: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 07:51:16PM +0000, Philip Hands wrote: >> Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> writes: >> > - only resignations from people who would have been expired count in S >> FWIW I think either of those deals with the concerns I raised, as it's >> going to be way too much effort to game that, and I cannot see why >> anyone would want to bother to do so. > > I think: > > On Jan 1st of each year the term of any Committee member who has served > more than 42 months (3.5 years) and who is one of the two most senior > members is set to expire on Dec 31st of that year. > > would work as a description of that approach. Seems like a pretty good > compromise between '2' and '2-R'. > > Also, it makes the arbitrarily chosen constant 42, which is always a > good thing.
That's clearly The Answer :-) The fact that people will get a year's notice, means that they can make sure that they leave at a time that minimises disruption, which seems like a very worthwhile idea. Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. |-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
pgpB2vbdYTXaf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
