>>>>> "Stefano" == Stefano Zacchiroli <z...@debian.org> writes:
[quoting out of order] >> I also believe that we should not treat the current situation as >> exceptional. This will not be the last time we have a tough >> issue before us that takes up a lot of emotional energy. It is >> strongly in the interest of TC members and the project for us to >> encourage people to find something that makes them happy when the >> TC no longer does. So, I recommend evaluating these mechanisms >> against future similar situations as an important evaluation >> criteria. Stefano> Agreed. Stefano> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:12:13PM +0000, Sam Hartman wrote: >> For myself I do not like the effects of option 1. [only 3 people on the TC] Stefano> Note that it has been proposed to amend option (1) to Stefano> remove the transitional measure. I have yet to see Stefano> objections to that proposal. Stefano> With that change applied, and limited to the effects you Stefano> discussed in your mail, proposal (1) will behave exactly Stefano> like (4). That's exactly the sort of thinking I was hoping to avoid when I said we need to avoid treating the current situation as exceptional. I dislike any option that would produce bad results if applied in the middle of the current situation. Why? I think the current situation could happen again at any time. Hmm, are you saying that I should dislike option 4 too because if we had three resignations in the middle of next year we could get into the same situation unless some of the resignations were from the senior members? I actually do find that reason compelling as an argument of 2-r over 2-s. --Sam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/00000149d25f1970-237fa94e-71b8-4195-98bc-8f99b68f88a6-000...@email.amazonses.com