On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 09:00:11PM +0000, Philip Hands wrote: > Stefano Zacchiroli <z...@debian.org> writes: > > If people really want to add a tie breaking rule, > > I was mostly trying to get rid of the need for one. > > How about just saying that appointments must be done one at a time?
You mean informally as a custom? Yeah, that sounds good enough to me, it's easy for the DPL to do so --- or to mention in the appointment email that the order is significant, or answer publicly to nitpickers who will call them out for having forgot to do so :-) If instead you meant changing the GR to also change the CTTE appointment section, I'm not particularly thrilled at that idea. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . z...@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
