On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 03:46:49PM +0000, Philip Hands wrote: > Philip Hands <p...@hands.com> writes: > > > Wouter Verhelst <wou...@debian.org> writes: > > > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:33:10AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > >> [...] > >>> 2. A member of the Technical Committee is said to be more senior > >>> than another if they were appointed earlier, or were appointed > >>> at the same time and have been a member of the Debian Project > >>> longer. In the event that a member has been appointed more > >>> than once, only the most recent appointment is relevant. > >> > >> I think it makes more sense to have someone who was previously a member > >> of the TC have more seniority, before "age" within the project: > > > > I think since this is a tie-breaker situation which will presumably > > rarely happen, it doesn't really matter much. > > How about: > > For the purpose of determining seniority, simultaneous appointments > are deemed to have taken place in the order of names in the mail that > announced their appointment. > > The TC can then decide how they're going to do the ordering at > appointment time, and that's then clear to all -- no need to come up > with lots of words that might still not give a distinct result.
That would work too, I suppose. -- It is easy to love a country that is famous for chocolate and beer -- Barack Obama, speaking in Brussels, Belgium, 2014-03-26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141123120453.ga24...@grep.be
