Philip Hands <p...@hands.com> writes: > Wouter Verhelst <wou...@debian.org> writes: > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:33:10AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> [...] >>> 2. A member of the Technical Committee is said to be more senior >>> than another if they were appointed earlier, or were appointed >>> at the same time and have been a member of the Debian Project >>> longer. In the event that a member has been appointed more >>> than once, only the most recent appointment is relevant. >> >> I think it makes more sense to have someone who was previously a member >> of the TC have more seniority, before "age" within the project: > > I think since this is a tie-breaker situation which will presumably > rarely happen, it doesn't really matter much.
How about: For the purpose of determining seniority, simultaneous appointments are deemed to have taken place in the order of names in the mail that announced their appointment. The TC can then decide how they're going to do the ordering at appointment time, and that's then clear to all -- no need to come up with lots of words that might still not give a distinct result. Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. |-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
pgpHVbmULUPTx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
