-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Iain Lane writes ("New amdendment proposal (Re: Proposed GR: Acknowledge difficulty of declassifying debian-private)"): > This is a new proposal which supersedes my previous one > <20160920165427.oeiaxkms7e63bao4@nightingale> (that proposal is > withdrawn).
FAOD I assume that this is to be taken as an amendment to Gunnar's, which replaces the whole text with your text. (Otherwise it would end up in a separate vote.) On that basis, Seconded. > 2. There shall be no declassification of any portion of the > debian-private archives, except in the following circumstances. > 2a. Participants may declassify their own material. > 2b. Participants may declassify the material of others where > consent has explicitly been given by the authors of all of the > material being declassified. I do think this is unnecessarily verbose. 2a is entirely redundant because obviously if a participant declassifies their own material they do so with their own consent, so are permitted to do so under 2b. Ian. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX4oFkAAoJEOPjOSNItQ05oPcIAMQKCi1muW2Zp33GT8uZVHwv 61vPR/58RWEBd7HlL4raoC7iIBLlOfARO00TsOr33rNh6WGheJvPu4ulbS67xDG4 fRKqWei5PAp8Ibj4Jt25S/aDt/5JdAGvHmA16o43GTJevVG11tuaTLmFmqpsehxx lVf4iF/sdC7DDmpRfke+e93Tyn6SYUWBL9NoJxd69ODYd+NAGwhLgTKFMBaK/nls 0sSH9RYwXnxVaaPeYNOkQ4QoDseWNXZn8ZhBjzWkpmH3iZn0Ig31m7mi6J12PUUj /nrA2L4pepRb5XxNSyd9MeCwIib67+KP2ZRUY/bJXNbNcTZ33BaFulBq5cE7tLc= =U9xZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.