-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:47:41PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > FAOD I assume that this is to be taken as an amendment to Gunnar's, > which replaces the whole text with your text. (Otherwise it would end > up in a separate vote.) On that basis, > > Seconded.
Yes, I was seconding it as such as well. > > 2. There shall be no declassification of any portion of the > > debian-private archives, except in the following circumstances. > > 2a. Participants may declassify their own material. > > 2b. Participants may declassify the material of others where > > consent has explicitly been given by the authors of all of the > > material being declassified. > > I do think this is unnecessarily verbose. 2a is entirely redundant > because obviously if a participant declassifies their own material > they do so with their own consent, so are permitted to do so under 2b. No, it isn't. That would be implicit, but 2b requires explicit consent. 2a makes sure that you don't need to write "I consent to declassify my own parts of this". I agree it's obvious, but technically 2b would require that if 2a was missing. Thanks, Bas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX4oKbAAoJEJzRfVgHwHE6Zj0P/3scJbVr6+wPrMOWHm5aJ1va z9ftVeyl06iE3KlN9lfPJZIXBsmJO52wSQyoWpYzxbh9h2zinQlIeVCXD91zoVm7 1Qy0WvyD6ByXfP5wqpDnQERYc+9021+4ipLp4qOHpT3WJgzze4F9YxIY3N8NFtQB 1CCIIsMBZuaiVYfHp7Zn2Pr37wh76TXlOWwAN5H60LWCoUOKnl4SH17YAJlzaR/S 34Qh9hXc80ivITbLuoe86jyH9d8xHPIZ7fFzwWMCg1WB3RBS1i7jw4hYTkL3yuuS bPWibz1jhgiLqYnBAnUY2xlwzshotu9e5DojgWCs4OcF540KlrDzeXKq0aZTcDlN UDySPcv9sKByHjTNVmo+/kWjyrrixOfDVReOwPGEkFauZEIU2cz9SM9CvehV5lAG vFiwR16MNQ/lmyOL2vzOuHFr38/XCP4FkaIKh1HWWXuYSwXXqHw1qOBLHE0Hkl2D LTdm/J6MFofEU3Oc/cgxuF1ncDAQs/SdZwBnvMNpJPvOsVBupTv+j5J/yaj4oI20 c60voSnhaplIy4SgRN4NsfOc7li2pfBVQTqmKbUqFMos0KgHfRNFitUCPIioR/sT FlbnrprY1bwzJ0c3UXiFWQOW/WSUFf9UBlCxKKj//ExXSHA06u3TacTgwZn67/da pV4ojqTvM3fU0AL+RubI =iamI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
