Hi Sean,

On Fri, 2024-06-28 at 14:06 +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Thu 27 Jun 2024 at 09:50am +02, Ansgar 🙀 wrote:
> > In particular I haven't had time to find anything after the discussion
> > with Russ, leading to having no idea why a checksum as suggested isn't
> > possible (it would work trivially for the counterexamples given...).
> 
> This isn't true.  You are just asserting it, without evidence.

Your claims are false both about me not having had time to read
messages (please provide evidence covering my private schedules
otherwise) and the evidence I provided about the example by Russ[1].
I'll expand on the here slightly for your benefit:

$ git clone https://salsa.debian.org/rra/tf5.git
[...]
$ apt-get source tf5
[...]
$ rm -rf tf5/.git tf5-5.0beta8/.pc
$ diff -Nur tf5 tf5-5.0beta8; echo $?
0

If one is really bored:
$ (cd tf5; sha256sum $(find . -type f | sort) | sha256sum -)
8d7820471fb44382a0c752319906064a1276ff18873fb4730dec1319aaf7b459  -
$ (cd tf5-5.0beta8; sha256sum $(find . -type f | sort) | sha256sum -) 
8d7820471fb44382a0c752319906064a1276ff18873fb4730dec1319aaf7b459  -

I will leave it as an exercise to you to compare the output and to
reason about results of different ways to compare both trees.

Please stop accusing others of "just asserting it, without evidence"
when it is trivial to show you claim of "This isn't true" is false.
I don't think your behavior is constructive in any way.

> You have not done the detailed work on this topic that we have.

Yeah, apparently not enough to even reason correctly about the trivial
cases... It seems to lead to claims that can be demonstrated as being
wrong trivially.

Ansgar

  [1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2024/06/msg00450.html

Reply via email to