On 2026/03/20 13:10, Simon Richter wrote:
It's perhaps not perfect, but it would catch a lot of cases that people are concerned about
>
I don't think we have to cater to people who are expressing unspecified "concern." Either there is an issue, or there isn't.
Yes, their "concerns" have zero impact on this, after talking to a few other people off-line, I've felt that this might be a good idea long before this nomination period ended. I'll provide more context after the election and possibly to -private as well, but it can and should really wait until after the election is done.
-Jonathan
