The second & third options would work, although the latter would take a much longer time.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2026, 8:46 AM Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > On 20/03/26 at 11:57 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > > On 2026/03/20 10:41, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > > I also would prefer if there was more than one candidate, but perhaps > > > changing the rules during the election isn't what we want. > > > > > > There's in fact 2 ways this could happen. > > > > > > 1/ Sruthi (temporarily) withdraw her nomination, just in order to > > > restart the nomination period. Is this really possible? > > > > > > 2/ Sruthi refuses to do 1/, and A majority vote NotA. > > > > I'd like to add a 3rd option (after the elections). Propose a GR for a > > change in the voting process, that if any candidates nominate themselves > in > > the last 12 hours of the nomination process, then the nomination window > > extends by another 48h to allow someone who specifically wants to > challenge > > that person to do so. > > Maybe let's not specify that the second candidate must specifically want > to challenge the first candidate :-) People should be allowed to > nominate near the end of the window without having to justify > themselves. > > Lucas > >
