On Sun, Apr 05, 2026 at 12:56:25PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: > Tiago Bortoletto Vaz [05/Apr 7:45am -04] wrote: > > "9. Lead discussions amongst Developers. > > > > The Project Leader should attempt to participate in discussions amongst the > > Developers in a helpful way which seeks to bring the discussion to bear on > > the > > key issues at hand. The Project Leader should not use the Leadership > > position > > to promote their own personal views." > > > > I still don't see anything close to "the DPL is meant to provide technical > > leadership" in the above section. I'm not English native and might be > > missing > > something? > > To me, providing leadership includes providing technical leadership, > because we are primarily a technical project. Especially so back when > the constitution was written. And "lead discussions" means "provide > leadership".
It does not, when you also read the next line of our constitution. The DPL does not have the power to make technical decisions, this is a power of the Technical Committee. "The Project Leader should not use the Leadership position to promote their own personal views." This even prohibits the DPL from pushing a technical discussion into a certain direction. "Lead discussions amongst Developers" in our constitution means moderating/mediating. > Sean Whitton cu Adrian
