On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 07:49:23PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
FWIW I agree with you using an LLM to prepare an NMU — and then _double-checking a full diff_, and becoming _personally_ responsible for any breakage it introduces.
I'd like to know what it means for you to be "personally responsible". I have broken key packages more than once without using an LLM, would I face other consequences if I broke key packagees with an LLM assisted contribution, any if yes, why?
We should be able to use whatever tools we can, but whatever goes in the distribution signed by [email protected] is _my sole responsibility_, and I cannot point fingers at any LLM for doing something wrong.
That's, in my opinion, how Debian works today. Even when I sponsor a package from a newcomer, I take some responsibility for that, and that's the reason why I don't enjoy sponsoring packages that don't use Salsa CI.
Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
