On Monday, August 10, 2026 11:55:58 AM Mountain Standard Time Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Soren Stoutner dijo [Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 11:41:41AM -0700]: > >That’s the beauty of the Further Discussion option. If there isn’t enough > >consensus in Debian for any of the options to be selected, then Further > >Discussion wins. That, in and of itself, is both a valid and useful > >outcome. It says that the project has selected the status quo above any > >of the other options. > > Let me just point out that, since the 2021/2022 vote on “change the > resolution process”¹, it is no “Further Discussion” any more, but “None of > the Above”. The semantics are very similar, but not exactly the same > (i.e. we should not feel compelled to keep discussing if NotA wins over all > options, we can just accept status quo 🙃) > > ¹ https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003
Good point. Somehow I had forgotten that. -- Soren Stoutner [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
