Just do like i do for our system, ALL mail with viruses or obvious spam is
deleted period, no questions asked, if you don't like it too bad. We never
lost 1 client.  I can't be bothered to review spam, not a chance, There was
whining at first but now all is quiet and everyone is happy.  All quiet on
the western front LOL!

webmaster
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc Catuogno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 9:38 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Feeling vindictive against spammers. Revenge?


> Let me first say that I'm a big fan of the Declude products and how they
> have significantly reduced the amount of spam my end users receive.  Let
> me also qualify my next statement by saying that I'm not as
> knowledgeable as I'd like to be about all the nuances of e-mail, DNS
> etc.   Sometimes I'm sketchy on the basics.
>
> That being said, I think that many spam battling methods seem to be
> passive.  The e-mail and IP blacklists in Declude essentially accept the
> mail then delete it.  What I'd like to see is a method of getting that
> mail destined for deletion and move it off to another mail server that
> would generate rejection messages (maybe on ratio of 10 or 100 to 1) to
> the X-Declude sender maybe even using the IP that the spam originated
> from.  This mail server would not accept <null> senders, it's sole
> purpose would be to reflect some of time and cost back to that spammers
> or the open relays that let spam pass.
>
> As long as spam is easy and profitable it will keep getting worse.  If
> spammers find that it seems most of their mail is getting bounced (100's
> or 1000's of rejections) and if the open relays find themselves flooded
> with traffic they may close up (or fix it if it accidental).
>
> I'd love to be on the moral high ground and just delete or hold the
> mail, but I spend a couple of hours each day reviewing held mail and
> adding IP's and domains to black lists.  It has to become more difficult
> and more expensive for them to do.  There must me more aggressive
> methods...
>
> Sorry for the rant....
>
> Marc
>
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> ---
> [Stealth Anti-Virus scanning] courtesy http://www.oilfielddirectory.com
>
>

---
[Stealth Anti-Virus scanning] courtesy http://www.oilfielddirectory.com 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to