Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim Log Level Low and IP

[Matt]

Let me ask people: do you think that it would be better to have the "Msg failed" lines in LOGLEVEL MID?  It would be nice to have a log level that was useful for most log analysis and not overly bloated for other reasons.  In fact, it would be nice to have  LOGLEVEL MID do a bit more trimming and combine two long lines into one, like so: ----- Combined Weights and Actions ----- 01/24/2004 05:50:14 Q4ddb009301dc335c From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  IP: 216.74.146.148 Subject: Celebrate The Big Game with Super Snacks ID: i0O9ML5n020939 01/24/2004 05:50:14 Q4ddb009301dc335c Tests failed [weight=11]: HEADERLINE=WARN SORBS-SPAM(DYNA)=WARN[3] SORBS-SPAM(ALL)=WARN[1] FIVETEN-SUPPORT=WARN(3) IPNOTINMX=WARN NOLEGITCONTENT=WARN SNIFFER-WHITE=WARN GIBBERISH=WARN(4) HIGH-MAILPURE=ROUTETO HIGH-CUSTOMER=IGNORE HIGH-SUBJECT=SUBJECT HIGH-BOUNCE=IGNORE HIGH-RECIPS=WARN 01/24/2004 05:50:14 Q4ddb009301dc335c L1 Message OK Note that I also placed the Subject in the first field and moved the Message OK action to the last line.  I believe this still would allow for full functionality and it would cut the size down to about half of what it is currently.  I definitely don't care for individual MSG Failed lines at this log level. Matt