Some had certainly not been addressed as of Delphi 2010. These are unlikely to have been addressed in XE either since their status already suggests that they are considered fixed (or in the case of suggestions/enhancements, implemented) when they are not.
Which raises the question of what a "fixed/closed QC entry" actually means, if things can be fixed/closed with nothing actually having been done (or, let's be generous, whatever has been done subsequently undone or at least not properly tested). From: delphi-boun...@delphi.org.nz [mailto:delphi-boun...@delphi.org.nz] On Behalf Of Colin Johnsun Sent: Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:49 To: NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List Subject: Re: [DUG] XE Upgrade Hi Jolyon, On 31 August 2010 13:12, Jolyon Smith <jsm...@deltics.co.nz> wrote: I might be more impressed if they had actually fixed some of the bugs I myself reported that have languished in QC for 8+ years (and had not introduced new ones related to those in the meantime). Just curious, did they ever get around to fixing those reported bugs this time round. From my understanding of the history of Delphi, during that time (8 years ago) Borland really turned its back on Delphi in its push to get away from its dev tool roots. But in the last year or two EMBT had made a big effort to address those concerns and really tackle a lot of those cases in QC. Did they deliver? Cheers, Colin
_______________________________________________ NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list Post: delphi@delphi.org.nz Admin: http://delphi.org.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi Unsubscribe: send an email to delphi-requ...@delphi.org.nz with Subject: unsubscribe
