I understand all your points.. Now.. Lets do a survey of Delphi developers.. How many people are there writing software in delphi and providing unrestricted full access licenses on an Honor system with the expectation that their clients might pay them later? excluding any trial limits, feature restrictions etc etc, but relying on a paper licence unsigned that states some rules that might get enforced.
I think the reality is that people will take it if it seems fair, and wont take it if it doesn't, but there isn't much point worrying about it. its a buyers market and the real loss will be to embacardo if they have made a bad decision. Whats that saying.. Better a million people pirating my software than pirating the competitions. :) eventually there is a return from someone. On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Jolyon Smith <jsm...@deltics.co.nz> wrote: > I find it depressing that people still can’t seem to get away from thinking > that people will set out to “cheat” Embarcadero by gaming reasonable license > restrictions. > > > > Most (“most” not “all”) people only “cheat” when they feel that the rules > aren’t fair in the first place. > > > > And as for profit being harder to track than revenue, just how are > Embarcadero going to track/monitor revenue in this area in the first place? > What earnings DO they recognise as relevant revenue? Without requiring that > only registered companies qualify for purchasing these licenses, how do they > expect to compel a set of audited accounts from their Starter licensees ? > > > > My guess: They won’t be enforcing the license terms in this way at all. > They will operate an “honour” system, in which case, making that system fair > and reasonable is the best way to ensure compliance. > > > > > > But the idea is to attract new users, right? Users who do Delphi as a > hobby or who have an idea that **might** make a little money (or maybe a > lot, tho in that latter case I don’t think Pro license costs will > necessarily hold them back). > > > > Comparing to another of my hobbies (photography), if I spend $1000 on > printing photos that I sell to my friends/colleagues for $1000, have I > “made” $1000 ? > > > > If Embarcadero were licensing me my camera they would say “yes”, even tho > my hobby is a break-even activity for me (allowing only for directly > measureable costs, and not other costs that are involved). And once I tip > over that $1000 *revenue*, my license costs go up immensely, and if I > don’t pay up, not only do I not get access to the bigger/better/brighter > features (that I don’t actually need, since by definition I didn’t use them > to get that far in the first place) but I also lose the right to use the > tools I already paid for!! > > > > I think I’d choose a different camera, wouldn’t you ? > > > > In the grand scheme of things I don’t see the idea of a revenue limit a > problem per se, but $1000 really isn’t very much and by no means establishes > an “ability to pay” for Professional licenses on an on-going basis. What if > I “earn” $1000 in the first 6 months from a flood of donations from > interested users etc. I am compelled to shell out $800 to remain within the > terms of my license. But then the donations dry up after that, reducing to > perhaps $500-$800 over the next 12 months? > > > > I don’t think this is an entirely fantastical situation to imagine. > > > > > > Don’t get me wrong, I think Delphi Starter is better than what we had > before (i.e. nothing) but this particular aspect of the license is worrying > (in terms of what it suggests in the thinking of those behind the > initiative). > > > > > > > > *From:* delphi-boun...@delphi.org.nz [mailto:delphi-boun...@delphi.org.nz] > *On Behalf Of *Kyley Harris > *Sent:* Tuesday, 1 February 2011 13:04 > > *To:* NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List > *Subject:* Re: [DUG] Delphi Starter Edition > > > > I would think Students too.. > > > > And I guess if you actually start making a $1000 they figure its enough to > pay for the software and then keep making money :D > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Jeremy North <jeremy.no...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > The $1000 revenue limit is also bizarrely low imho - it's high enough to > > worm it's way around any "non-commercial use" restriction, but not high > > enough to realistically be anything other than a "non-commercial use > only" > > restriction in all but name. > > It is targeted at open source or hobbyists developers. I don't see any > issues with the limit. > > Is the $1000 per year or a running total? > > _______________________________________________ > NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list > Post: delphi@delphi.org.nz > Admin: http://delphi.org.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi > Unsubscribe: send an email to delphi-requ...@delphi.org.nz with Subject: > unsubscribe > > > > > -- > Kyley Harris > Harris Software > +64-21-671-821 > > > _______________________________________________ > NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list > Post: delphi@delphi.org.nz > Admin: http://delphi.org.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi > Unsubscribe: send an email to delphi-requ...@delphi.org.nz with Subject: > unsubscribe > -- Kyley Harris Harris Software +64-21-671-821
_______________________________________________ NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list Post: delphi@delphi.org.nz Admin: http://delphi.org.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi Unsubscribe: send an email to delphi-requ...@delphi.org.nz with Subject: unsubscribe
