On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:55, Marius Bogoevici <marius.bogoev...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > If anything, I think that @Typed should be more restrictive and require at > least one type (cannot find a justification for creating a bean with no > actual types, even if optimization would skip over it). However, that is a > discussion for a different place :). > +1! (deprecation warning if backwards compatibility is required). -Dan -- Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
