On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:55, Marius Bogoevici <marius.bogoev...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I suggested @Unmanaged (or even @NotManaged, or anything that refers to > "class as a managed bean" in the spirit of 3.1.1). Overall, I think that > @Unmanaged is a better fit, for the reasons I explained previously. I think > that renaming is not such a big issue, in the light of a DeltaSpike > migration. > I agree. The best suggestion yet, esp since we seem to be at an impasse between @Veto and @Exclude. I think that @NotManaged reads better than @Unmanaged, but I would be happy with either one. -Dan -- Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
