I agree with Gerhard. We should definitely start a vote in which every one can vote for ONE favorite and then pick the one with the most +1s.
Regards, Jakob 2011/12/30 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>: > the easiest way in this case is a formal vote about @Veto vs @Exclude vs > @Unmanaged/@NotManaged > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2011/12/30 Dan Allen <dan.j.al...@gmail.com> > >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:55, Marius Bogoevici >> <marius.bogoev...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> > I suggested @Unmanaged (or even @NotManaged, or anything that refers to >> > "class as a managed bean" in the spirit of 3.1.1). Overall, I think that >> > @Unmanaged is a better fit, for the reasons I explained previously. I >> think >> > that renaming is not such a big issue, in the light of a DeltaSpike >> > migration. >> > >> >> I agree. The best suggestion yet, esp since we seem to be at an impasse >> between @Veto and @Exclude. >> >> I think that @NotManaged reads better than @Unmanaged, but I would be happy >> with either one. >> >> -Dan >> >> -- >> Dan Allen >> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action >> Registered Linux User #231597 >> >> http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen >> http://mojavelinux.com >> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction >> -- Jakob Korherr blog: http://www.jakobk.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr work: http://www.irian.at
