We understand what it means, but many out in the wild don't understand that, and I think Romain is correct that many view it as "oh, this is stable and production ready now."
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > nope, TLP only means maturity on the social/community side. > > For any users it's just a matter of 2 minutes doing a search/replace on > the imports and then rebuild their app. > That's nothing which we cannot do easily. > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > To: gudnabr...@gmail.com; deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2013 10:13 PM > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] re-visit "annotation" package/s > > > > I dont fully agree even if i get you. For a bunch of people tlp = > maturity > > = stability > > Le 2 avr. 2013 21:47, "Matt Benson" <gudnabr...@gmail.com> a > > écrit : > > > >> I would agree with Gerhard that TLP and 1.0 are not necessarily linked > >> concepts. I would think most developers would not be surprised by the > idea > >> that any release number < 1.0 is not guaranteed not to change. > >> > >> Matt > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Cody Lerum <cody.le...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> > Works for me. I was only using @Excludes and I can just switch to > >> @Typed() > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:57 PM, John D. Ament > > <john.d.am...@gmail.com > >> > >wrote: > >> > > >> > > If that's the case, we should target it for 0.4 and forward. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com > >> > > >wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > +1 after first tlp release to be exact > >> > > > Le 2 avr. 2013 20:38, "John D. Ament" > > <john.d.am...@gmail.com> a > >> > écrit : > >> > > > > >> > > > > Once DS is a TLP, we should try avoiding breaking > > integrations. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Gerhard Petracek < > >> > > > > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > that can happen until v1 (and not until deltaspike > > is a tlp). > >> > > > > > (it was one of our first agreements.) > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > regards, > >> > > > > > gerhard > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > 2013/4/2 Romain Manni-Bucau > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Think people know ds is not yet a tlp so some > > instability is > >> fine > >> > > > IMHO > >> > > > > > > Le 2 avr. 2013 20:00, "Cody Lerum" > > <cody.le...@gmail.com> a > >> > écrit > >> > > : > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > One small problem is the early > > integration of DS into JBoss > >> > > Tools - > >> > > > > > > > > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-13901 > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I don't know how many people if any > > are using that > >> integration > >> > > yet. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Pete > > Muir <pm...@redhat.com> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > +1 to drop, I hate them. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On 1 Apr 2013, at 10:06, Christian > > Kaltepoth < > >> > > > > christ...@kaltepoth.de > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > +1 for dropping > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 2013/3/31 Cody Lerum > > <cody.le...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> drop em. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at > > 10:35 AM, Mark Struberg < > >> > > > > > strub...@yahoo.de> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> yes, let's drop > > them. annotations are like interfaces > >> > > > nowadays. > >> > > > > > So > >> > > > > > > > this > >> > > > > > > > > >> is > >> > > > > > > > > >>> just superfluous. > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> LieGrue, > >> > > > > > > > > >>> strub > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> ----- Original Message > > ----- > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> From: Gerhard > > Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> To: > > deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Cc: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Sent: Sunday, > > March 31, 2013 5:30 PM > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] > > re-visit "annotation" package/s > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> hi @ all, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> we had an > > agreement to use a (sub-)package named > >> > > > "annotation" > >> > > > > > for > >> > > > > > > > all > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> our > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> annotations within > > a package. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> however, it feels > > a bit clumsy if a package > >> (currently) > >> > > just > >> > > > > > > > contains > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> annotations. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> e.g. > > org.apache.deltaspike.core.api.exclude only > >> > contains > >> > > > the > >> > > > > > > > package > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > "annotation". > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> currently we have > > a mixture (some parts are using the > >> > > > > > "annotation" > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> package > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> and some > > don't) > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> -> we have to > > align it the one way or the other. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> i'm currently > > in favour of dropping the > >> > > > > "annotation"-package/s. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> regards, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> gerhard > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > > > > Christian Kaltepoth > >> > > > > > > > > > Blog: > > http://blog.kaltepoth.de/ > >> > > > > > > > > > Twitter: > > http://twitter.com/chkal > >> > > > > > > > > > GitHub: > > https://github.com/chkal > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > -- Jason Porter http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
