+1
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Gerhard Petracek < gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi @ all, > > we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named "annotation" for all our > annotations within a package. > however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package (currently) just contains > annotations. > e.g. org.apache.deltaspike.core.api.exclude only contains the package > "annotation". > > currently we have a mixture (some parts are using the "annotation" package > and some don't) > -> we have to align it the one way or the other. > i'm currently in favour of dropping the "annotation"-package/s. > > regards, > gerhard > -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
