+1
On 01/04/13 02:35, Mark Struberg wrote:
yes, let's drop them. annotations are like interfaces nowadays. So this is just
superfluous.
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:30 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] re-visit "annotation" package/s
hi @ all,
we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named "annotation" for all
our
annotations within a package.
however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package (currently) just contains
annotations.
e.g. org.apache.deltaspike.core.api.exclude only contains the package
"annotation".
currently we have a mixture (some parts are using the "annotation"
package
and some don't)
-> we have to align it the one way or the other.
i'm currently in favour of dropping the "annotation"-package/s.
regards,
gerhard
