On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 00:04 +0200, Éloi Rivard wrote: > 2013/5/17 Richard Shann <richard.sh...@virgin.net> > On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 16:21 +0200, Éloi Rivard wrote: > > About generate_commands, > > > > You said it generates ancient built-in commands. Do you mean > it is the > > old way to generate built-in commands ? What would be the > new one ? > > > I think you meant generate_source.c (it generates C source > code). It was > constructed initially by taking an array out of Denemo and > using the > array to generate new C code for those commands. It also has > sets of > commands for note names A-G and note durations 0-7 generated > programmatically. > > New commands are either pure scripts, or if some C-code is > needed a new > primitive is created as outlined on irc #denemo > > > Do you mean those old built-in commands could actually be written in > scheme ?
No, they are the most primitive things in general, though some could be written (via scheme) as a sequence of others. (I am thinking of things like add an f-sharp major keysignature command, which presumably could be done some other way ... perhaps not easily ... but then, who actually wants such a command?) One difference (IIRC) is that they use gtk_action_group_add_actions to add the commands specified via an array of GtkActionEntry structures. Richard _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list Denemo-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
