Daniel John Debrunner wrote: You cannot have a GA version of a JDBC 4 driver until JSR 221 goes final.Andrew McIntyre wrote:Call in the lawyers:From JSPA - 2.0.1 10 January 2005 [1], which presumably the ASF boardhas executed, being a JCP Member (they've even got quotes from Geir prominently featured on their "about JCP 2.6 page" [2]): 5.B. License to Create Independent Implementations.Dumb question, is Derby: - creating an independent implementation of JSR221 - or is it implementing a driver that adheres to JSR221? I would say Apache Harmony (when/if they tackle Jave SE 6) would be creating an independent implementation of JSR221 and that Derby is not. The Derby Embedded and Network Client drivers provide implementations of the JDBC drivers based on JSR 221. A Java SE implementation provides the interfaces and concrete classes that are used by a JDBC driver for the given Java SE implementation. JSR 221 falls under the umbrella spec for Java SE 6. They all go final together. Dan. |
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release schedule David Van Couvering
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release schedule David Van Couvering
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release schedule Daniel John Debrunner
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release schedule David Van Couvering
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release sched... David Van Couvering
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release schedule Lance J. Andersen
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release schedule David Van Couvering
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release schedule David Van Couvering
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release schedule Lance J. Andersen
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release schedule Rob Stephens
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release schedule Craig L Russell
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release schedule Rajesh Kartha
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release schedule Rick Hillegas
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release schedule Kathy Saunders
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release sched... Rick Hillegas
- Re: Proposal for 10.2 release ... Kathy Saunders