[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> They all seem like bug fixes that would need to be merged to the new branch
>>> so unless I hear otherwise, I plan to cut the branch(es) from revision
>>> 635183. 
>>
>> Can you confirm that 635183 was the revision base for the branch?
>
> Yes.

I have updated 
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenFourRelease
so that lists this and other important revisions for the branch (similar
to 10.3 Wiki).

I also moved the testing section up, and added some scaffolding.

-- 
dt

Reply via email to