[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13412794#comment-13412794
]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-5853:
----------------------------------------
Perhaps you could ask the JaCoCo community on their mailing list for some
suggestions
about how to diagnose this problem. Is there additional logging/tracing in the
JaCoCo
tool that we can enable that will help us identify where the coverage
information is
being lost?
> Test for methods in BrokeredPreparedStatement
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-5853
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5853
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Siddharth Srivastava
> Assignee: Siddharth Srivastava
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: brokeredps.patch, pstest.patch
>
>
> According to emma code coverage report, several methods of
> BrokeredPreparedStatement are uncovered.
> This issue deals with adding tests for those methods.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
