[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13414430#comment-13414430
]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-5853:
----------------------------------------
The Emma documentation discusses exceptions in sections 2.5, 2.6, and 2.7 of
the FAQ:
http://emma.sourceforge.net/faq.html#q.blockcoverage
"Thus, EMMA does not attempt to track the success or failure of every
single
bytecode instruction: instead, it marks a basic block covered when the
control
reaches its last instruction. A covered basic block is thus guaranteed to
have
executed without failures at least once in a given coverage run session."
"the motivation behind this has been that most legitimate code is written
so that methods return normally (without throwing an exception)."
> Test for methods in BrokeredPreparedStatement
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-5853
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5853
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Siddharth Srivastava
> Assignee: Siddharth Srivastava
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: brokeredps.patch, pstest.patch
>
>
> According to emma code coverage report, several methods of
> BrokeredPreparedStatement are uncovered.
> This issue deals with adding tests for those methods.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
