Hi Nik, all, On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Nik <n...@tdf.nikashsingh.com> wrote: > [...] > I hope this gets interpreted as helpful feedback and not b!tching/lecturing. > I'm just genuinely concerned about what we put out for the public to see. > And a lot of people might see these. > Sorry if I came across rude; no sleep. > And sorry Ron, I'm not having a go at you, it's just a touchy matter?
+1 to your whole email. I hate to say this, but I could create that saturated gel effect in Photoshop in 10 seconds (IIRC, it's one of the default presets available for instant use); using such 'stock' effects for banners would speak ill of LibreOffice's quality; we need something more sophisticated if we are to be credible. The same (+1) goes for Bernhard's point about interpreting apparent lack of replies. I was going to reply to this email, but I realized that in order for my reply to be constructive, it would necessarily have to be long to explain things sufficiently and I just didn't have the time. Thank you both for raising these points so clearly, and I hope we can all work together to iterate the banner design to something we can all be proud of. Regards, Ivan. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
