Hi Bernhard, all,
Like you say, UX is a common and widely understood acronym.
Personally, I think [GD] for "Graphic(s) Design" encompasses all other
activities: Visual identity/Branding/Print collateral/Merchandise/User
Interface/Web/etc.
But realistically Bernhard, I think maybe we are putting too fine a
point on this?
This doesn't seriously warrant a vote or comprehensive "polling". This
is one of those cases where a "Team lead" could swiftly implement a
productive decision without drastic repercussion.
I think in this case you should decide a convention and I have faith the
rest of us will trust your judgement and abide by the decision you make.
Even if it has your initials =)
I know Christoph wasn't too keen on the Leadership thing, but you're
flying the ship solo now.
We can get more done if the rest of us focus on Designing, and you focus
on steering.
Pick a prefix system and let us know, we'll roll with it =)
It is just a prefix system after all.
-Nik
On 5/23/2011 4:54 AM, Astron wrote:
Hi there,
how about [Visl] and [UX]? While with "Visl" you have a shortened
form, it's still pretty easy to make out just what it is about
(namely, visuals). Although on the other hand, it might come across a
bit unprofessional.
Astron.
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 6:47 PM, ol klaus-jürgen weghorn
<o...@sophia-louise.de> wrote:
Am 21.05.2011 22:47, schrieb Bernhard Dippold:
Possible tags would be:
[VI] for Visual Identity
+1
k-j
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
