Hi Marc
I'm fine with that - where there is any ambiguity then use 4.
I think that we're getting close to deciding a minimum number of tags -
just need to decide on the method of democracy. My suggestion is that we
have for each actual Term we want to represent by tags, a choice of tags
and we all vote for the ones we think are the better alternatives for
each Term.
Does anyone have any suggestions for carrying out this process?
I think that whatever is used could be used again for deciding things
like recommendations for changes to LibreOffice.
Cheers
Phil
On 5/22/2011 3:22 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2011-05-21 18:29, Phil Jackson a écrit :
Hi Bernhard
Good point about some confusion for some shorted tags.
There has to be a balance I think in terms of brevity and identification
while taking into account acronyms that might have dual meanings and
having some consistency.
Might I suggest that we do something like your suggestion for ViDes but
have 3 letters for first word and 2-3 for second word
The following and other tags could be
[VisIde]
[BraDes]
[VisDes]
and
[UsaPro] for Usability productivity
[UsaInt] for Usability Interface
Also, you are right about having a reference page somewhere for Design
Tags - this could be for example on the first Design\WhiteBoards page.
Cheers
Phil Jackson
On 5/22/2011 8:47 AM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
I was also going to suggest the same thing about 3-4 letter
designation. Most first language EN speaking person could get a better
guess of the meaning behind these designations although "Usa" will be
more difficult. Perhaps "Usab" instead? "Prod" instead of "Pro". This
way we can shorten the learning curve for new users by quite a bit.
I would favour:
[VisDes]
[UsabProd]
[UsabInt]
Cheers
Marc
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
