On 05/24/2016 01:43 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 05/24/2016 12:32 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote: >> I've added a pair of dashboards along those lines: >> >> http://techdesignpsych.com/Temporary/snowdrift/ >> > Looks good, looking forward to feedback from others or more nice design > variations from the visual design folks. > > One thought: "reflect your wishes" is a little too generous. Someone > might wish for things that go beyond the controls we're offering (for > example, "I wish I could keep donating $2 to that project and not have > to match anyone any further", which we would respond to as "the matching > agreement from everyone is what makes this work, without that, or with a > simple per-project cap, we can't get the widespread cooperation we > need…" At any rate, getting people to think about their wishes is less > desired compared to getting them to think about specifically tweaking > within the "rules of the game" that we've set up. > > My inclination for the wording is: "Please consider increasing your > maximum to reinstate all pledges. Alternatively, you may remove pledges > or adjust pledge level as desired." > > Something like that. In this case, the only max change that will help is > an increase, so we can say "increase" instead of "change", and I like > encouraging people to think of that as the suggested action.
I like "Please consider increasing your maximum". On reflection, and after experimenting, I'm thinking perhaps that's all we need. I've updated both versions of that dashboard with just that for now. <snip>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Design mailing list Design@lists.snowdrift.coop https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/design
