On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 16:11 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Top Ten Reasons People Complain About Gnome: > > > > * Number 1: This statement: > > > > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 15:50 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > >> The settings are > >> there in gconf so everyone is free to come up with a configuration > >> tool if you find anything worth configuring there > > It wasn't meant as a "provide patch" kind of statement. I just believe > this falls out of scope of GDM and should be part of control center.
I wasn't referring to the "provide a patch" attitude. To some degree, that's inevitable in any free software project. I was referring to the attitude that we can stick things in GConf without a graphical configuration tool. Every single release, the semi-joke response on any give forum is "What options did they remove this time?" Could we at least try to avoid giving them fodder? -- Shaun _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list