General anger is not something which need to be translated.I, for example, want
all best to GNOME and to this community.But, as far as I could see, some things
go in wrong way andI just would like to point on that.
I'm more than ready to help to improve the things and alsoI want to become one
of significant contributors, but firstI do not know how many developers GNOME
have and itsresponsibilities, I do not know how whole life-cycle goes,etc. I
mean I know something but not on satisfying levelto be able to develop.
Uros
-----------------------------------------------
"Every kind of peaceful cooperation among men
is primarily based on mutual trust and only
secondarily on institutions such as courts of
justice and police."
- Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955)
> Subject: Re: Appearance properties
> From: ru...@savanne.be
> To: had...@hadess.net
> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:34:40 +0100
> CC: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
>
> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 14:23 +0000, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 09:04 -0500, Pierre-Luc Beaudoin wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 10:55 +0100, Ruben Vermeersch wrote:
> > > > Having a ton of icons is certainly not good, but is there anything
> > > > that shows that having none at all is better?
> > > That's my 2 cents as a user: unless studies have generally identified a
> > > speed up in menu usage, I would think it was a move the opposite.
> >
> > There's a bugzilla with plenty of reasons behind this change. You're
> > more than welcome trying to second guess our esteemed community
> > usability people.
> >
> > I think most of the anger in this thread stems from the fact that "it's
> > changed". Well, progress comes through changes, and nothing was ever
> > achieved with status quo.
> >
> > Maybe we'll change our minds later, but without compelling arguments,
> > it's hard to make a case for reverting this change now.
>
>
> Bastien, please don't translate this thread into general anger. Atleast
> for me, it's not the case. I can certainly see the upside of it in a lot
> of places. As such I'm not asking for a revert, I just wanted to note
> that going from one end of the extreme all the way to the other feels
> weird at some places.
>
> But I do welcome the change (and I highly respect our usability people,
> consider this a feedback loop, not an attack).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live: Keep your friends up to date with what you do online.
http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_1:092010_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
