On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:00 +0200, Peteris Krisjanis wrote: > 2009/11/10 Patryk Zawadzki <pat...@pld-linux.org>: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Xavier Claessens <xclae...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> What I find totally insane is to not leave the UI to change that. New > >> settings is clearly not accepted by a large (majority?) part of users. > >> Except ~5 devs, I see nobody happy with it. > > > > Um, it doesn't work that way. I'm happy with it but I'm not compelled > > to post about it. My girlfriend is either happy about it or she > > doesn't give a damn, she didn't post about it either. It always seems > > as if the majority was unhappy as the unhappy ones are generally the > > only people who write. > > > > So because there are maybe majority of happy (and ignorant) users, we > will ignore rather loud opposition to this change? Really nice way to > deal with community.
so, let me get this straight: the proper way to deal with a community is to heed to the wishes of a vocal minority? > Google for 'PulseAudio Hate' and then maybe try to understand what > dangerous road have GNOME project taken last two releases. I propose a Lennart's Law, similar to Godwin's: as soon as PulseAudio is mentioned in a thread then the person mentioning it lost the argument. wth has PulseAudio to do with this? > We don't > that luxury to waste users just because we think what we do is > technically right. who's "we"? ciao, Emmanuele. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list