On So, 01.07.2012 16:11, Andreas Nilsson wrote: >> I'd like to end on a constructive note. I propose that GNOME adopt >> the following policy. No major feature will be removed from a core >> GNOME application before a discussion has occurred on a public mailing >> list such as this one
>You probably want nautilus-list for nautilus specific discussions. >https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list His proposal was a desktop-wide policy on feature removals, taking a recent change in Nautilus as an example. As such, it's not Nautilus-specific. I've also been unpleasantly surprised by this and other removals. I liked Colin's mail about regressions due to systemd/gnome-settings-daemon back in January [1], and the general idea that regressions should be avoided and only put into place if they really warrant a sufficiently large step forward. Holger [1] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2012-January/msg00136.html _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
