Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: > Dave, > > This is gonna be depressing, but the size of the GNOME packages > with the 2.24 update is expected to increase by about 11MB > (compressed!) Attached is a StarOffice spreadsheed (and a pdf > export for easier reading). > > It looks likes like firefox3 accounts for almost 1/3 of the > size increase. >
I've already accounted for firefox, I believe, since FF3 is in the builds already, though your sizes for the l10n packages differ a bit from mine. We'd already had some discussion about breaking out non-essential themes, and I thought you'd already done some of the re-packaging; is that accounted for here? That's the other main contributor. > There is 1 new required package, SUNWlibtasn1 but we should > also consider SUNWespeak and SUNWgnome-a11y-speech-espeak for > better accessibility support. > That is still being considered, depends on where we end up with other things. Dave > Laca > > On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 15:10 -0400, Dave Miner wrote: >>> Filters are not yet implemented. >>> >> One possible outcome here is that we ask IPS to kick up the priority of >> implementing filters to help solve the problem. >> >> Anyway, thanks for digging in, Laca. We can certainly ensure that stuff >> that's split out into separate packages stays out. For the moment, no >> need to do anything, I'm waiting on some data about l10n and other >> things before putting together revised recommendations. Are there any >> other significant changes in the 2.23.x packages that we need to account >> for?
