Hi Andras,

I'll leave it to Willie Walker to provide additional detail here as 
needed. 

Fundamentally, folks are working hard to fix this bug in the 
packagemanager GUI.  Separately, the question of whether accessibility 
is on/off by default for *all* users is distinct from whether an 
individual user can turn it on for *their* default use so that it is on 
whenever they log in.  Or in this case, when they go to install their 
desktop (which means it must be on the LiveCD).  If they cannot have an 
accessible desktop until they have downloaded additional packages, then 
we have a rather serious chicken/egg problem.  As has been pointed out 
in that (and/or perhaps related) thread(s), the command line is also an 
option for users who want to download additional packages (and need 
accessibility support in the case that this bug isn't fixed).


Regards,

Peter

> check this thread:
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/jds-review/2008-September/003151.html
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Peter Korn <Peter.Korn at sun.com> wrote:
>   
>> Andras,
>>
>> laca, i read in a different thread that a11y isn't enabled by default
>> so why to include that packages ?
>>
>>
>> Accessible install is part of what we're planning for 2008.11.  The blind
>> (or whatever) user can turn accessibility on with a keyboard gesture and
>> have a talking install from their talking desktop that they've booted to
>> from the LiveCD.  We really can't have that work if we are missing the
>> accessibility packages on the LiveCD...
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Laszlo (Laca) Peter
>> <Laszlo.Peter at sun.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dave,
>>
>> This is gonna be depressing, but the size of the GNOME packages
>> with the 2.24 update is expected to increase by about 11MB
>> (compressed!)  Attached is a StarOffice spreadsheed (and a pdf
>> export for easier reading).
>>
>> It looks likes like firefox3 accounts for almost 1/3 of the
>> size increase.
>>
>> There is 1 new required package, SUNWlibtasn1 but we should
>> also consider SUNWespeak and SUNWgnome-a11y-speech-espeak for
>> better accessibility support.
>>
>> Laca
>>
>> On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 15:10 -0400, Dave Miner wrote:
>>
>>
>> Filters are not yet implemented.
>>
>>
>>
>> One possible outcome here is that we ask IPS to kick up the priority of
>> implementing filters to help solve the problem.
>>
>> Anyway, thanks for digging in, Laca.  We can certainly ensure that stuff
>> that's split out into separate packages stays out.  For the moment, no
>> need to do anything, I'm waiting on some data about l10n and other
>> things before putting together revised recommendations.  Are there any
>> other significant changes in the 2.23.x packages that we need to account
>> for?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> desktop-discuss mailing list
>> desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/desktop-discuss/attachments/20080915/3fd098c6/attachment.html>

Reply via email to