Hello Moinac, Yeah there is SFEazureus, but I would not to call him stable. Lot's of people are not able to install it correctly(including me) and it has very strange dependency:
Requires: SFEeclipse I guess that there are lot's of people which want torrent client, but don't want to have installed Eclipse ... (and if they are using NetBeans, the situation is much worse ... ) Regards, Petr 2008/1/26, Moinak Ghosh <Moinak.Ghosh at sun.com>: > Petr Sobotka wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I miss some bit torrent client/tracker in the list. > > I think that lot's of people use them, so there should be at least one > > in stable (if not in core) list. > > I vote for SFEtransmission for which I gladly be a maintainer. > > > > There is also the Java based SFEazureus already present. But it is > always > better to have more choices. > > Regards, > Moinak. > > > Regards, > > Petr > > > > P.S.: Laca I'm very busy lately too (new job) so you don't need to > > worry about it... > > > > 2008/1/25, Halton Huo <Halton.Huo at sun.com>: > > > >> Laca, > >> > >> MetaTracker and it's dependcies are moved from SFE to vermillion dock > >> yesterday. Their maintainers are: > >> > >> * libgsf Halton ?(SUNWgnome-desktop-search-libs) > >> ?* gmime Jerry Tan ?(SUNWgmime) > >> * libgc Jijun Yu ?(SUNWlibgc) > >> * w3m Halton ?(SUNWgnome-desktop-search-libs) > >> * tracker Jerry Tan ?(SUNWgnome-desktop-search) > >> > >> I will also take maintainer as filezilla. > >> I will not take maintainer for aspell, gvim for I have little knowleadge > >> on them. > >> > >> BTW, if somebody interested in take libgsf, w3m and filezilla, I have no > >> problem to give them out. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Halton. > >> > >> On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 22:32 +1300, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Sorry about the long delay. Here's an update about the effort that > >>> I posted about here[1]. > >>> > >>> We reviewed a lot of packages that we would like to include and > >>> sorted them into categories: > >>> > >>> - Core: no equivalent functionality exists in OpenSolaris and > >>> the quality is reasonable > >>> - Stable: there is equivalent functionality, but some people > >>> prefer this package and the quality is reasonable > >>> - Encumbered: packages in this category would be nice to have > >>> but legal issues currently prevent Sun from distributing > >>> them. (The spec files may be available and you are > >>> welcome to build and install them if that is legal where > >>> you are or if you have the necessary licenses, etc...) > >>> - Experimental: everything else > >>> > >>> First we would like to concentrate on Core, then Stable and finally > >>> Experimental packages. Attached is the list of Core and Stable > >>> packages. A "+" means we have a spec file in SFE, "-" is obviously > >>> if we don't. The names after the packages are the people who > >>> worked on the spec files (many thanks to them). I'm hoping that > >>> most of these people will be interested in becoming package > >>> Maintainers. (Of course others are welcome to get involved!) > >>> Each package will also have a Sponsor, who is a Sun employee. > >>> I'm writing a document about the responsibilities > >>> of the Maintainer(s) and the Sponsor, but it's basically this: > >>> > >>> Maintainer: > >>> The maintainer is ideally a person who regularly uses the package > >>> and knows it well. Responsibilities: > >>> - keeps the package up-to-date > >>> - monitors bugs in defect.opensolaris.org > >>> - interfaces with the upstream community > >>> (submit bugs upstream, stays informed about coming changes, etc.) > >>> > >>> Sponsor: > >>> - legal review > >>> - export control > >>> - ARC review > >>> - other internal paperwork > >>> > >>> The immediate tasks for Maintainers are: > >>> - check if the spec file in SFE is the most recent version > >>> - check that it builds on snv_<recent> > >>> - check that it installs cleanly > >>> - check that it runs and basic functionality works > >>> > >>> If your name is on the list, or if it's not, but you would like to > >>> be the Maintainer of a package, please reply to me (not the list!) > >>> and let me know which one or which ones. > >>> > >>> Additional packages may be proposed later, but chances are they > >>> are already in the experimental list or some other team within > >>> Sun is already working on them. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Laca > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/desktop-discuss/2007-December/011657.html > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> desktop-discuss mailing list > >>> desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> desktop-discuss mailing list > >> desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > desktop-discuss mailing list > > desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org > > > >
