Petr Sobotka wrote: > Hello Moinac, > > Yeah there is SFEazureus, but I would not to call him stable. > Lot's of people are not able to install it correctly(including me) and > it has very strange dependency: > > Requires: SFEeclipse > > I guess that there are lot's of people which want torrent client, but don't > want to have installed Eclipse ... (and if they are using NetBeans, > the situation is much worse ... ) >
Yeah. That's something bad. The Eclipse package has to be refactored to create a separate SWT package that apps can depend on. I had put some fixes into SFEazureus so it should build now. Regards, Moinak. > Regards, > Petr > > > 2008/1/26, Moinak Ghosh <Moinak.Ghosh at sun.com>: > >> Petr Sobotka wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I miss some bit torrent client/tracker in the list. >>> I think that lot's of people use them, so there should be at least one >>> in stable (if not in core) list. >>> I vote for SFEtransmission for which I gladly be a maintainer. >>> >>> >> There is also the Java based SFEazureus already present. But it is >> always >> better to have more choices. >> >> Regards, >> Moinak. >> >> >>> Regards, >>> Petr >>> >>> P.S.: Laca I'm very busy lately too (new job) so you don't need to >>> worry about it... >>> >>> 2008/1/25, Halton Huo <Halton.Huo at sun.com>: >>> >>> >>>> Laca, >>>> >>>> MetaTracker and it's dependcies are moved from SFE to vermillion dock >>>> yesterday. Their maintainers are: >>>> >>>> * libgsf Halton ?(SUNWgnome-desktop-search-libs) >>>> ?* gmime Jerry Tan ?(SUNWgmime) >>>> * libgc Jijun Yu ?(SUNWlibgc) >>>> * w3m Halton ?(SUNWgnome-desktop-search-libs) >>>> * tracker Jerry Tan ?(SUNWgnome-desktop-search) >>>> >>>> I will also take maintainer as filezilla. >>>> I will not take maintainer for aspell, gvim for I have little knowleadge >>>> on them. >>>> >>>> BTW, if somebody interested in take libgsf, w3m and filezilla, I have no >>>> problem to give them out. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Halton. >>>> >>>> On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 22:32 +1300, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Sorry about the long delay. Here's an update about the effort that >>>>> I posted about here[1]. >>>>> >>>>> We reviewed a lot of packages that we would like to include and >>>>> sorted them into categories: >>>>> >>>>> - Core: no equivalent functionality exists in OpenSolaris and >>>>> the quality is reasonable >>>>> - Stable: there is equivalent functionality, but some people >>>>> prefer this package and the quality is reasonable >>>>> - Encumbered: packages in this category would be nice to have >>>>> but legal issues currently prevent Sun from distributing >>>>> them. (The spec files may be available and you are >>>>> welcome to build and install them if that is legal where >>>>> you are or if you have the necessary licenses, etc...) >>>>> - Experimental: everything else >>>>> >>>>> First we would like to concentrate on Core, then Stable and finally >>>>> Experimental packages. Attached is the list of Core and Stable >>>>> packages. A "+" means we have a spec file in SFE, "-" is obviously >>>>> if we don't. The names after the packages are the people who >>>>> worked on the spec files (many thanks to them). I'm hoping that >>>>> most of these people will be interested in becoming package >>>>> Maintainers. (Of course others are welcome to get involved!) >>>>> Each package will also have a Sponsor, who is a Sun employee. >>>>> I'm writing a document about the responsibilities >>>>> of the Maintainer(s) and the Sponsor, but it's basically this: >>>>> >>>>> Maintainer: >>>>> The maintainer is ideally a person who regularly uses the package >>>>> and knows it well. Responsibilities: >>>>> - keeps the package up-to-date >>>>> - monitors bugs in defect.opensolaris.org >>>>> - interfaces with the upstream community >>>>> (submit bugs upstream, stays informed about coming changes, etc.) >>>>> >>>>> Sponsor: >>>>> - legal review >>>>> - export control >>>>> - ARC review >>>>> - other internal paperwork >>>>> >>>>> The immediate tasks for Maintainers are: >>>>> - check if the spec file in SFE is the most recent version >>>>> - check that it builds on snv_<recent> >>>>> - check that it installs cleanly >>>>> - check that it runs and basic functionality works >>>>> >>>>> If your name is on the list, or if it's not, but you would like to >>>>> be the Maintainer of a package, please reply to me (not the list!) >>>>> and let me know which one or which ones. >>>>> >>>>> Additional packages may be proposed later, but chances are they >>>>> are already in the experimental list or some other team within >>>>> Sun is already working on them. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Laca >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/desktop-discuss/2007-December/011657.html >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> desktop-discuss mailing list >>>>> desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> desktop-discuss mailing list >>>> desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> desktop-discuss mailing list >>> desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > desktop-discuss mailing list > desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org >
