On 15/11/2007, Brian Cameron <Brian.Cameron at sun.com> wrote:
>
> Shawn:
>
> > I think that SQLite could provide real value to developers by being
> > integrated as a shared component. This vague resistance to its
> > integration seems rather odd to me, given that MySQL and PostgreSQL
> > already have been integrated. SQLite compared to both of those is
> > positively tiny and is becoming widely-adopted among software
> > developers (thanks Mac OS X, etc.).
>
> The issue here has to do with what Sun means when they say "support".
> Sun has a policies that we try to only ship things that we know our
> users can depend upon (won't break on upgrade, for example).  Database
> interfaces tend to have lots of consumers, which make them trickier
> to manage.
>
> There are similar "tricky to manage" interfaces like libexpat and
> libxml.  Just getting all the internal groups who depend on these
> interfaces all talking and working together is time consuming.
>
> In fact, these are part of the reasons why Sun has a policy
> that all database interfaces should be managed by a single group, the
> database group.  Our group isn't allowed to just add database interfaces
> willy-nilly without engaging them.  In our past experience of getting
> BerkeleyDB support for JDS (needed by evolution), this is a slow
> process.  The JDS team is starting to engage the database team on the
> ideas of bringing SQLite into Solaris, but it's too early in the
> discussion to really set any expectations.
>
> I'm not saying that it is impossible to get SQLite into Solaris, but
> there are some extra hurdle's to manage.
>
> Any help that people in the community want to do to assist with ARC
> and other processes to get SQLite into Solaris is, of course,
> very much appreciated.

Thanks for your response Brian; the database group is something I was
unaware of, but makes sense.

-- 
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/

"We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all
junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics
are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall

Reply via email to