Calum Benson wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 12:18 -0700, Glenn Lagasse wrote:
>
>
>> Except:
>>
>> a) Thunderbird is more widely available on other platforms (windows/OS
>> X) and so I would say it's got a far greater following.
>>
>
> ("More widely installed", perhaps, but Evolution works fine on both
> Windows and OS X as well.)
>
> Cheeri,
> Calum.
>
>
I hardly call a bad port using X11/GTK+ on OSX a worthwhile client. I
know of NO users that like how GIMP works on OSX, so why would kludge
non-consistent, memory gulping poopy be better? Evolution is alien,
non-native, not integrated, memory hungry, buggy, and inconsistent on
OSX, and I'm sure it's only slightly less of stinky cheese bait on the
Windows side, which at least has a native GTK+ port. Most the
engineers, if not all specialize in X11 integration, it's not good
enough to just port it and expect people to eat it up like it's
candy-coated dogfood, it's still dogfood complete with alien probe and
meteor to UNIX non-users.
James
