On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:09 AM, James Cornell <sparcdr at sparcdr.com> wrote: > Yeah, but at least they are making an active attempt to make it more > integrated/native with Firefox 3.0. At least they use an Apple > supported framework too, albeit Carbon.
As long as they use XUL, people will continue to complain. > Carbon apps typically smell of high CPU usage, Cocoa of high memory > usage, and GTK of kludge and stinkbait. Sorry, but I don't think GTK deserves your criticism. It has been working towards a native mac look just as much as FireFox. But, let's stay on topic and not have flamewars over "favourite toolkits". Thanks, -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." - Robert Orben
