Naoyuki Ishimura wrote:
> Hi Darren,
> 
>>> So if user uses remote system and
>>> the physical keyboard type/layout does not match with the
>>> result, then he/she needs to set it manually with iiim-properties
>>> 'Keyboard' tab to use layout emulation functionality.
>> Is the user made aware of this - i.e. if it wasn't possible to detect are 
>> they
>> prompted or a notification icon shown?
> 
> Unfortunately no, as iiim does not know if auto detect result is
> wrong... (ioctl returns some info anyway)

That's unfortunate.

> 
> Yes, I know the variation in the same language version of layout
> is causing confusion, and some issues have filed actually.
> We're adding such variations (like Czech/Qwerty to Czech) as request
> (filed issue) based for now.
> And I'm planning adding user customizable layout emulation feature
> to iiim. (I will send spec in the near future)

That sounds like it might be what I need ;)

Look forward to seeing it.

> 
>>> Regarding C (non UTF-8 or Asian) locale, the Input Method
>>> server (iiimd) is not running, and iiim functionality (including
>>> keyborad layout emulation) is not activated.
>>> It may be future enhancement, but current our priority is UTF-8
>>> locale.
>> Understood, but I'm wondering if it *could* be enabled now, without more 
>> work?
>> If not, then maybe the keyboard switcher applet could be used to fill that 
>> gap?
> 
> Execute 'iiimx -iiimd' will activate some features, but such environment
> is not supported now.

Understood.

> 
>>> BTW, iiim does not use XKB data at runtime, but uses XKB symbol data
>>> at iiim build time (/etc/iiim/layoutdata.xml).
>>> The reason is that we want to support non XKB env (Xsun default).
>> Agreed, but since Xsun is being EOL-ed then I think we can consider moving on
>> from that with Open Solaris and focus on Xorg for enhancements.
> 
> Yes, it could be, although I'm not willing to develop iiim for S10U? and 
> OpenSolaris separately.

I don't think that you should, but I would say that we shouldn't allow Xsun to
limit what we could be doing...

Thanks,

Darren.

Reply via email to