On 9/07/2008, at 5:16 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Ghee Teo wrote: >> emily chen wrote: >>> The Bugster is an internal bug system. So for the Desktop testing >>> community, we should use OpenSolaris bugzilla. That means we need to >>> make the bug process in bugzilla more clearly. >> This is an excellent point, who owns defects.opensolaris.org now? >> We >> need someone to set this up and allow request to be made to this. For >> example, for presto pre-integration tests, we ended using an >> internal >> copy of bugzilla which in hind sight is wrong and it is my faults :(. >> Can desktop has its own category/subcategories in >> defects.opensolaris.org , Glynn, any idea? > > tools-discuss is the contact point for defect.opensolaris.org. > > Please remember that defect.opensolaris.org is still only to be > used for projects under development (not yet in Nevada - so > Vermillion counts, but then tracking bugs that are in both > Vermillion & Nevada gets painful) and projects that are in > OpenSolaris 2008.05 and not yet Nevada (like IPS & the IPS GUI). > > bugster/bugs.opensolaris.org still needs to be used for bugs in > Nevada, > and for bugs that may be escalated by customers with support contracts > or that may need to be backported to older releases. > > This is of course not the long term plan, just the current phase > of the transition we're in.
I don't see any reason why you couldn't have a development sub- category in defect.opensolaris.org, unless Stephen is specifically disallowing projects to be added there. Obviously the proviso of having to track QA for Solaris updates/Nevada still carries. Glynn
