I don't see any individual bashing in this thread. It's an organizational change, as you say.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015, 11:29 AM Etienne Segonzac <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Dietrich Ayala <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> To be clear, you mean manually but not locally, right? I am talking about >> using automation prior to landing on the trees consumed by downstream, like >> is done with gecko+Firefox with inbound trees, etc. Things like try servers. >> >> Nobody should have to run them locally and our learning there is that >> locally run test results are not to be trusted. >> > > Interesting. We're in complete agreement about what we need (sorry about > the snarky-ness of my earlier comment). > > But the harsh reality is that raptor tests are still too noisy to be > displayed on *gaia*-try. > Which means there's a long way to go before gecko try builds warn platform > developers about OS performance regressions. > > It's a huge task, with many technical challenges (AFAIK we'd need > on-device runs to get really good results), and we have 2 developers on it > (against, AFAIK). > > This is why I'd like to see a bit less individual-developer bashing and a > bit more organizational change to show that, as a project, we care about > performance. > >
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
