On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Fabrice Desré <[email protected]> wrote:
> Raptor automatically reports performance regressions. If one is due to > gecko (like when someone broke nuwa recently) it needs to be treated the > same way we would do with gaia. I see absolutely no difference there. > Well this is clearly not happening. You just asked Russ to bisect gecko to pinpoint a potential performance regression found by manually testing the video app. What exactly was done automatically in this scenario? > > Note that we don't run Talos performance tests on try either - you get > emails after the fact if your commit is in the range of a regression. > Maybe raptor should also send this kind of emails? > As always there's no disagreement about what we need. But there's a big disconnect with what we have.
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
