On 04/02/2016 12:08, Chris Mills wrote: > Please give me your comments/ideas/worries about this — obviously I want > to collect a good amount of feedback and make sure the community likes > the direction I am going in with the docs, before making any major > decisions.
Regarding the FxOS-specific parts that are known to be discontinued (marketplace, etc...) I agree that archival is the best option. For the rest and specifically the build instructions, tech docs, etc... I think it would be best to wait until we have some clarity about what we'll do with the actual components. If the existing code can be streamlined and moved forward so that it becomes a toolkit for others to build their own web-based OSes on top - possibly with default apps taken out of gaia - then that material will be important, and it will be paramount that we update it if we want the project to be contributed to and actively developed. This would obviously imply that we need to "de-brand" all the relevant pages since it won't be called Firefox OS anymore as you point out in your document. If on the other hand we're just dropping everything and walking away then there would be no point in maintaining it as nobody will be able to pick up the project without help and support from within Mozilla. Unfortunately, there's absolutely no clarity on this aspect at this point and in the light of recent communications I'd tend to lean on the latter being the case rather than the former. Gabriele
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
